Monday, May 16, 2011

Crews' FOIAs shine some light on discipline and suspensions

I know there are serious discipline problems in our schools, I see them every single day I am in a District 150 school. There is rampant bullying, fighting and disrespect of fellow students and adults - there is no denying it. It won't stop until somebody begins to force the schools to discipline the students who continue to disrupt our schools. If the schools don't do it, the parents of the children who are being bullied and assaulted need to take matters into their own hands and form parent advisory groups on discipline within their schools (as set out by IL law), contact DCFS to make sure the schools are making the required reports and/or press charges - even against the schools, if necessary.

From the comments sections...

..., my FOIA and 20 some pages of data that took me probably 20 plus hours to compile--to learn the following:

From September to March 21, 4,736 District 150 students were suspended and 77 were expelled. Hopefully, many of these were repeat offenders. The suspensions for only the 1,768 suspensions for aggressive behaviors that encompass fighting, threats, bullying, reckless conduct, and battery to school personnel.

About 1400 suspensions were for fighting and/or physical conduct where injury may occur. For these categories there were 39 expulsions. Manual had 276 suspensions in these categories but only 7 expulsions. Peoria High, with the much larger population, had 255 suspensions but 22 expulsions. Richwoods had 95 suspensions and 3 expulsions. Forty-nine students were suspended for physical battery to school personnel and 9 were expelled.

Workman’s Comp payments totaling $27,403 have been paid out for 44 District 150 employees for injuries sustained during these incidents. The constant rumors of fights turned out to be fact. There were only 7 out of 121 days with no suspensions in the district for fighting.

For the following numbers, I am using only the figures in the Physical Activity Fighting category. There were 94 suspensions for fighting at Glen Oak Primary compared to only 81 at Peoria High. Lincoln had 82 suspensions. Both Roosevelt and Trewyn had 67 for the PAF category.

For the other schools, Manual had 110 suspensions, Richwoods 63, Franklin 33, Irving 9, Thomas Jefferson 20, Mark Bills 15, Calvin Coolidge 32, Columbia 22, Lindbergh 16, Rolling Acres 43, Sterling 39, Von Steuben 20, Valeska 1, Day Treatment 9, and 42 at the 3 alternative sites and Adult Ed.

Many suspensions were for 2, 3, or 4 students on a given day. However, there were 13 days when from 5 to 8 students were suspended for fighting at a particular school.

There were two days of these multiple suspensions at Manual, two at Peoria High, two at Glen Oak, and one each at Roosevelt, Trewyn, and Columbia. In addition, there were 515 suspensions for the Physical Activity Aggression category, which involves physical contact where injury may occur—that sounds like fighting to me.

10 comments:

Peoria Anti-Pundit said...

This says a lot about the student population. A parent committee? Really? That's the problem. No parent has apparently stepped up and taken responsibility for their kids actions. It's always; "It must be the teacher." or "It must be the school." Maybe a mirror would work. Now you know why our schools can't pass a simple State standards test. They are nothing but places to drop your kid. Look at the suspensions. Gee it must be the teachers fault. They simply aren't getting through to these young people. Can't be the lifestyle these kids grew up in. Bull!

Sharon Crews said...

Frankly, I don't care so much if parents blame teachers--many need a scapegoat because (especially, by high school) they don't know how to keep their kids from being under the control of the gang mentality and influence in so many neighborhoods. I might add that I rarely had parents accuse me of being the problem--I know that I was in a unique position of teaching the children of students whom I had taught, etc.

What truly upsets me are the administrators and maybe even some board members (from past and present) who blame teachers. Most of the administrators were once teachers themselves--and many of us know (if we taught with them and we did) that they had the same problems that the rest of us had--and the same results. In their heart of hearts, they have to know that they wouldn't have accepted the blame some of them try to place on teachers today.

As to the excitement about the reforms in tenure and other rules affecting the ability to fire teachers, let's have this conversation in ten years. As one person responded on a PJS story and as I have said before, the bad teachers know how to curry favor with administrators--they will still be there and the good teachers brave enough to question the system and/or administrations will be gone. Education is not a business--if it were the kids who can't behave would be long gone because they would have a negative impact on business's bottom line (education's test scores). The methods businesses use to produce a successful product just don't work in education.

That was a bit off topic. My thanks to Emerge for getting the suspension data "out there." As I said to the board, suspensions and expulsions (and peer interventions and other kinds of interventions--all the tried "feel good" methods)are not doing anything to change the situation.

Also, I said that shuffling principals won't help either. I still believe a "real" alternative school is the answer--if someone has a more creative and workable solution, OK.

Also, about the data--since the school board votes on suspensions and expulsions, I see no reason why the data as I received it shouldn't be posted on the minutes: date of offense, school, type of offense by code, and length of suspension or expulsion.
Also, every day kids are suspended--so why didn't the board have any suspensions to vote on at the last board meeting (and, I think, the one before)?

Frustrated said...

Nice article about the Jackson triplets in the paper. There should be an article per week in the PJS reporting something "remarkable" that is happening at the District.

IMO, there should be more charter and magnet schools where children demonstrating reasonable effort, conduct, and attendance can find safe haven.

Sharon Crews said...

Frustrated, why not an alternative school so that all 150 schools could be safe havens--they were at one time. Why have multiple schools in chaos because of a relatively few (growing in number when they feed off one another) when there is another solution besides sending only the "good" kids to a charter or magnet school. I fully understand why parents want to escape to these schools--but their children should not have to go across town to school.

Sharon Crews said...

Yes, it is great to read about the Jackson triplets. I do remember when they were just little guys. Annette Ruffin, their mother, had been one of my students and later a Manual teacher. It is not an accident that the Jackson children have done so well--good parenting shows.

Peoria Anti-Pundit said...

The Jackson's are a good news story and there are a lot of them out there in District 150. They just don't sell papers.

Why do we need all these special schools? Why can't we simply enforce the rules and if these kids don't want to be there, then fine. I know. This puts them out to the streets and trouble. So, we get the parents and we hold them responsible. If they are on Link or aid, then their welfare depends on what they do for their child. If they do nothing, then they get nothing.
I saw a young girl the other day who was pregnant. She is a senior in high school. I got up the nerve and asked her what insurance she had. She looked at me as if I was crazy. I asked, who was paying for the birth as my insurance didn't cover every single thing when my wife had a kid. She said that she had a medical card and they pay everything. I am thinking that if maybe, just maybe, these young girls who think it's cool to get pregnant (and they think it's cool) had to pay for the services, they may think twice as would the father. That is what is wrong with these kids today. They expect, no, demand a hand out.

Anonymous said...

That is so true Peoria Anti-Pundit. I have had several girls tell me they get pregnant because either their mom won't have any kids left to be able to have the Link card or that they themselves don't want to have to work so by getting pregnant they will be able to get the Link card. It is a sad world today with generation after generation collecting the freebies. Do you know that anyone on free or reduced lunch or on the Link card gets a free cell phone and also free minutes per month. Many people on the link card don't have to pay for anything. It is no wonder the kids are like they are. The discipline in the schools needs to be handled. There are no consequences for the disruptive students.I don't know how anyone expects the teachers to teach with all the disruptiveness that goes on. The students will tell you nothing will be done to them so they can keep acting out.

Peoria Anti-Pundit said...

Yes I do know about the FREE cell phones. Been to the website and they are free if you have a Link Card. (basically) I wish someone would pick up my Verizon bill once in awhile.

I marvel at all the talk on the blogs about how this District is run, who is not doing this or that and how money is being spent or isn't being spent. Blame has been thrust upon the Administration, the teachers, even cafeteria workers (remember the bad lunches?) Blame has been heaped upon Principals and just about everywhere else except no one, or at least very few, point the finger at the real problem, the clients or students and the absent parent(s) who thinks the schools should clothe, feed, and teach their kid without any input from them. Simply get them there and it's the school's problem. I mean, there is a room where history is taught, English is taught in another and I assume math is still another so in what room is respect, dignity, and ethics taught? Oh, maybe this is something to be taught at home?

Peoria Anti-Pundit said...

Look at Pekin, Dunlap, Washington. Schools in our area that have some of the same problems our district has. Yet people move out of Peoria to send their kids to these schools. So what's up here at District 150?
The problems this District has is simple. 99% is the students. Every time a kid punches a teacher, we have people who think that Johnny needs special help. He needs a special class or a pill. He is mis-understood. We shouldn't kick out a kid because he fired a pistol in the hallway. (ask Ms. Ross) The kid needs help. So, we spend money on special schools, create other special schools so trouble kids can get help and kids that want to learn can get an education only that leaves the kids in the middle no where. You know, the kids that attend the good old fashion regular school. That is why I hate charter schools. First you have a lottery to get in and if you don't well too bad. You have schools for troubled kids but they turn into a babysitting service and have very little or no effect whatsoever. They are sent back to the school and usually get expelled again. Then you have early childhood schools that are government supported and are designed to get children early on and teach them how to succeed in the schools. These schools have been around for over 25 years but have you seen an improvement in the quality of student by the time they reach middle or high school? Nope. Why? Because these kids are raised mostly by irresponsible parents or and absent parent or even handed off to a grandmother. Their homelife sucks and that is where they learn to use the system. Granny is usually young by standards and is collecting SSI. The taking in of the kid increases her Link and on the system goes. The child grows up learning that everyone else owes them something and if they aren't getting it, it's someone else's fault. Hard to take but it's the truth in a lot of cases. Yes there are those single parents that strive and work and support their child but these people are few and far between.
To see how the Link system works, stand in Kroger's at the service desk for about an hour. You'll see young girls come in, ask how much on their Link card, get cash and then head down to the nail place. Then you'll see older women with babies in their cart and a cart full of food. These are the grandmas. What you rarely see is a man near any of these women. At work? Maybe but two jammed shopping carts full of food and paid for by a Link card? I doubt it.
So, if you want to fix the problem it should be simple. If the trouble makers in our school are as they say, a small percentage, then kick their asses out and be done with them. Prison is their likely venue anyway. Then drop the bullshit and make the parents responsible and hold them to it. It takes two to make a baby so, if you are on aid, fine, you have to show up at your child's school and volunteer X amount of hours. You have to show up for conferences and if your kid gets into a fight, you have to go to consoling with your kid. Homework must be signed by you. If you become absent, then so do your benefits. If we stick to this, kids will learn respect, learn that handouts and lunch aren't free, and we may develop a better generation of kids who don't think getting pregnant by senior year is cool.

Anonymous said...

I totally agree with you. You said it all. Imagine the poor teacher who sends the student to the office for disrupting the class and the student gets sent back to the class room continually. By disruption I mean cursing out the teacher, throwing things, etc. The student will tell you they will be back. And they are right. A lot of students do not get to school on time. They are late anywhere from 5 minutes to several hours. The same ones each day. Something needs to be done to the chronic truants too.