
Whether you’re out front stumping or behind the scenes running a political campaign, blogs can connect the candidate with the people. They can communicate your message to the most influential business professionals and at the same time trigger conversations that mobilize grassroots support.
It’s good for the public when elected officials blog, especially when what they write is a good source of information. But when a public official blogs about pertinent issues or the controversial stuff, does the back-and-forth conversations on contentious issues help? Or does such transparency just give people more reasons to dislike you?
One of District 150’s most vocal Board of Education (BOE) members, Jim Stowell, is a regular commenter on a couple of the local blogs. Noted for its strong opinions on all things District 150, the
Peoria Chronicle blog is one of the most popular in the Peoria area, and the main place you can find Mr. Stowell’s comments.
BOE blogger(s)
As we know around these parts, people are passionate about school district issues. As a result, Mr. Stowell has been taking some serious heat on the blogs. It has been interesting to watch, because he can give as good as he can take. However, considering the regular ass kicking he continues to get from angry bloggers, I often wonder why he bothers. If Mr. Stowell were ever to consider slumming on a local blog, that does not get 20,000 hits a day (EmergePeoria), this blogger would ask him a few questions:
1. Wouldn’t it be better if you had your own blog and put out a consistent, coherent message showing your research?
2. Why doesn’t the public relations person for the District try to put out fires, and build consensus on the blogs?
3. What does the District public relations person think about BOE members commenting on blogs?
4. What is your main goal when you blog?
5. What does the other BOE members think about you commenting on blogs?
6. What does the President of the BOE think about you commenting on blogs?
7. Is it your intention to mobilize support for your self as an elected official, or to mobilize support for the BOE as a whole?
8. Do you discuss your opinions as expressed on blogs with your board members?
Should newspapers follow-up on leads from blogs?

What if a public official makes a comment on a blog that hasn’t been reported on before? What if pertinent information is uncovered that the public has a right to know (see
Elaine Hopkins report on accounting discrepancies at District 150)? Aren’t the issues raised on the blog “fair game” for reporters to follow-up on and bring the story to the public at large?
IMO, if it is the newsroom’s job to question certain issues, the information uncovered on blogs should be eligible for vigilant coverage. As long as the reporter can verify that the information came from a valid source, the information on the blog should be considered fair game?
I have a plan, he has a plan, she has a plan…

Wednesday, the Peoria Chronicle reported that BOE member,
Martha Ross has a plan. Mrs. Ross, who has been brutalized on local blogs, has managed to earn some points with the release of her proposal to the Chronicle. Even Emtronics (the
Peoria Anti-Pundit), who has made it clear he detests many of Mrs. Ross’ decisions, has said that he likes her plan better. As a matter of fact, several bloggers gave Mrs. Ross props for her plan.
But wait, what should the
Community do about Mr. Stowell’s plan and the
Superintendent's’s plan? Does Mrs. Parker have her own plan? How about Mrs. Wolfmeyer, Mrs. Spangler or Mrs. Butler, do they have a separate plan? What about discrepancies, is the
Content in the plans presented valid? I’m confused, there is no
Consistency, there is no
Clarity, how is this supposed to work?
Wouldn’t it be in the best interest of the community for the BOE to present one cohesive plan? Wouldn’t that build more trust with the public if we got the impression that they are actually on the same page and are a united front, before showing up at a School Board meeting to make life altering decisions for our children? Absent one cohesive plan presented by the BOE, how do we decide who has the winning Plan?
What, pray tell, is the plan for deciding on the Plan?